SAGA
DemoOpen workspace
Haemophilia intelligence radar for Rare Disease teams

Public change,
made reviewable.

SAGA screens haemophilia updates, preserves the evidence, and routes material signals to the functions equipped to assess them.

Open workspace See the full workflow
Public, mock, or synthetic data onlyEvery released claim keeps its source
Intelligence brief
Find signalsStart guided demoHome
Demo examples Start the guided demo

Haemophilia intelligence brief

Review relevant updates and the evidence behind them.

Signals awaiting human reviewSensitive records require review at any priority.
Open review queue
Source records checked
Priority review records
High-priority signals
Filtered with a reason

Preview Sample content. Counts and source passages are omitted.

Filters and workload Show Open filters in the workspace

Review records

Select a priority band, then open one signal without leaving the brief.

View
Trial StatusHuman review requiredSample record

Trial registry · Haemophilia

Trial status update

Review guidance

Why it matters · review guidance

Review the change against the earlier registry entry before updating the briefing.

Review team

Medical, Regulatory

Possible follow-up

Compare the source versions and record the review decision.

Source evidenceTrial registry
Human review requiredRecord review
Evidence and audit details
Source versionsEvidence checksRouting policyInspect a complete record

Every signal keeps its source and review history.

Source-linkedEvery released factual claim keeps its evidence
AuditableReviews and filtered records keep their history
Human-ownedPeople assess relevance and choose the response
From source to review

Detect. Prove.
Route. Review.

See how SAGA checks a source, prepares a record and routes it for review.

01

Screen broadly

Public sources are normalized, deduplicated, and checked against the disease pack.

02

Prove the claim

The displayed change is checked against its evidence. When a draft cannot be verified, SAGA shows source text instead.

03

Route and learn

The right function receives the evidence and review context. Structured feedback becomes a governed calibration proposal.

Source-linked by design

Evidence stays
with the record.

The source, exact quote, content hash, review state, policy version, and route remain inspectable after human review.

Inspect evidence in the workspace
Verified rendering

Released factual claims require source checks; unsupported drafts are withheld or replaced with source text.

Accountable suppression

Discarded records keep a reason, score, and audit trail.

Governed calibration

Feedback proposes a versioned rule; it never silently changes the system.

Safety boundary

Flagged sensitive language requires qualified review. This is not complete safety surveillance.

Start here

Choose what you
want to inspect.

Read the project in the browser, open the product, or download the presentation.

Open the project hubSetup, workflow, AI use, evidence, and limitsDownload the final presentationEditable seven-slide PowerPointOpen the private GitHub repositoryAsk Team codechondria to add your GitHub account firstTry the working demoOpen the interactive replay